
In the
post on
The Name of the Wind, I discussed the RPG test for certain stories. And I read this trilogy by Joe Abercrombie just because the commenter Ultrablam wrote, in response to that post:
"Well, you've brushed me off a couple of times about it, presumably because it represents fifty-eight thousand tons of reading in
paperback, but if you want fiction that passes the RPG test with flying colors, you've just gotta read
The First Law series by Joe Abercrombie."
Now, book recommendations are often like life advice from your great aunt. But Ultrablam, who is writing his own RPG (which you can read about
here), knows what he's talking about. So when he said these books passed his own RPG test, I listened.
I'm not in the business of reviewing books here, but these three --
The Blade Itself,
When They Are Hanged, and
The Last Argument of Kings -- are awesome.
Because of how I found out about this trilogy, the RPG test was constantly on my mind when I
wasn't reading them. They were too good to think about anything else
while reading. But I had to discuss with Ultrablam why he thought these books would ruin the curve for all the other books taking the RPG test. Yes, they were awesome. Especially for the characters, which, well, make an RPG what it is. But the stories themselves would, in my opinion, make for poor games for any group larger than two players, simply because the characters spend so much time apart. The number one rule in my RPG experience is: Never. Split. Up. Not only do bad things happen, but the rest of your gaming crew gets left out of huge chunks of the action.
Turns out Ultrablam's personal RPG test is different than mine. Where I look at whether the story itself could have been born of a group of geeks sitting around a table eating chips and fruit snacks, Ultrablam looks at whether the world of the story -- the geography, the cultures, the populace, the politics -- would be conducive to a good RPG.
In that model,
The First Law would make for a kick-ass game.
I'm not revising my model for evaluating certain books for RPG quality. But the theory is under evaluation. Because as a role-player, all I ever have to focus on is the development of characters and interactions within a given world. It's the easy part. But the great GMs of the world (like Ultrablam himself) have to be the Universe. They have to create the world for the characters to move around in. And that lends itself to a whole different style of evaluation.